What Is Natural?

I came across this really interesting question as I leafed through the food legislation news headlines this week. The reason I find it so interesting is because there are currently too many definitions of the word natural within the language of the Western diet, and I believe it's really important that we pause and consider what 'natural' means to each of us.

Food industry use the word 'natural' liberally on food packaging. This is understandable, it appeals to people who value health. But how natural is natural? The dictionary defines it as "existing in or formed by nature". This definition works well for me. As a naturopath I believe all our food should be formed by nature and untouched by man. Thus, if you're reading a package label, you're often way off the mark already! Even if it does claim to be natural, it probably wasn't formed by nature. With the exception of natural pot set yoghurt (the really sour stuff), possibly a couple of items in the health asile (but by no means all of them), most things claiming natural ingredients are far from being formed by nature.

Colourings and flavourings are often advertised as natural. This strikes me as odd considering they're often synthesised in a lab. Currently the laws allow food industry to call a colour or flavour natural even if it's a synthetic copy of a substance found in nature. This said, I can't think of a single food containing added colours and flavours, natural or otherwise, that I would call a real food.

Sugars often confuse people attempting to eat well. When refined sugar is added to food it becomes junk food. This is true of many things we may think are good for us, like breakfast cereals, yoghurts, cheeses, breads and juice. Many commercial juices scream that they have no added sugar. What they fail to mention is that they have added loads of concentrated fructose (this is the meaning of 'reconstituted'), which science is learning can be more damaging than ordinary sugar. Eating a whole fruit is fine because it's dilute. The fibre and water in the fruit act as buffers and slow the absorption of the sugars. Other truly natural sugars include raw, unprocessed honey, raw, unprocessed maple syrup, palm sugar and agave syrup. Even these should be used sparingly.

Grains are another misleading area. Grains are made to sound natural by use of the word 'wholegrain'. A whole grain should be one that is visibly whole, exactly as is was when it was pulled from the stalk, like rice, oats or quinoa. Most breakfast cereals are made from refined, processed grains, while their box advertises the 'wholegrain goodness' of the contents. Remember, if it's not a true whole grain, it's sugar, not complex carbohydrate, and therefore not a good breakfast choice. The same is true of crispbreads, rice crackers, pasta, bread and couscous.


Oils are another problem. Any oil sold in a clear bottle, or that doesn't say 'cold pressed' is not natural. It's been mixed with petrochemicals and boiled to incredible temperatures to give it shelf life. These oils and the margarines made from them are certainly not natural or healthy, despite sporting the heart foundation tick.

In fact, if I'm going to be really picky, how natural is it to use chemical fertilisers, pesticides and fungicides on our food crops? Or to freeze them for weeks before selling them? For me, the only truly natural foods are fresh, organic plant foods and biodynamic animal products.

I think it's really important that we all consider what our food is made from, because our body is made from what we choose to eat. It's sad that food has become so complex that we have to wonder 'which food is really food?', but in the west its the only way to stay healthy. So, next time you see the word 'natural' on some 'food' ask yourself "was this formed by nature or by a guy in a factory?".

http://www.foodnavigator.com/Legislation/What-natural-means-in-food-regulations/?c=mvNDRfNEiPf7l3PB0f6h2g%3D%3D&utm_source=Newsletter_Subject&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletter%2BSubject